Ker-Plow! Thump! Bash! Yeah, Yeah, Yeah!

If you were to catalogue my obsessions in to some sort of, well, catalogue and then flip to the ‘B’ section you’d find ‘Beatles, The’ and ‘Batman’ snuggled in comfortably together (seperated by ‘Bears’ and ‘Bay, Car Chases in the Films of Michael;’)  How thrilled I was then to hear that, back in the mists of time, these two iconic forces had collided in the pages of a comic book.  Sort of.  The Beatles, in this particular story, are re-interpreted as ‘The Oliver Twists’ but it’s pretty obvious what the writers are getting at.  It’s also clear that the writers were, for want of a more succinct phrase, mad as a flannel of badgers.  Tonight (or whatever time of day you’re reading this), I present this, possibly the most extraordinary comic, nay piece of literature, ever written, to you.

Now before we get cracking on the issue itself, I think I’d better put this piece of work into some sort of context.  In 1970, a rumour circulated that not only was Paul ‘Thumbs Up’ McCartney dead, but that he’d popped his clogs in 1966 when he’d been decapitated in a car crash and been replaced in The Beatles by a lookalike in order to keep the lucrative business of the band going.  However, those myschievious Scouse band-mates of his had subsequently managed to place a number of clues in their music and artwork to let dedicated fans know the truth about their deceased songwriter and the conspiracy to replace him.  This is what lunacy looks like when it’s Olympic standard.

Some people have, however, spent the last few decades mercilessly trawling through the Beatles work to find these hidden messages.  The full list of ‘clues’ they’ve come up with is far too lengthy and, frankly, bizarre to go into here but- as a taster, let’s have a look at the cover of ‘Abbey Road’.

At first glance, it’s the Beatles wandering over a zebra crossing but, for believers in this sort of thing, it’s actually a dazzling cavalcade of signs and signifiers that makes Dan Brown’s ‘interprative’ ‘work’ in ‘The Da Vinci Code’ seem like he simply wasn’t looking hard enough.  You’ll notice that Macca himself has no shoes on despite wearing a suit- a situation that can be easily explained when one considers his twin ports of wacky old hippy and rampaging commercialist.  But the death theorists claim that he’s barefoot because, in Italy, dead people are buried without shoes.  And, just to prove the point, the rest of the Beatles are lined up in the order of a funeral procession- Lennon all in white representing God/The Chruch, Starr in black as the mourner, the dead body of McCartney and Harrison in denim as the grave digger.  And the numberplate on the Volkswagen Beetle reads ’28IF’ because McCartney would have been 28 if he’d lived.

Quite impressive bit of deduction, isn’t it?  Well it is till you realise that pretty much every Beatles photo of the era has Harrison dressed like a Russian farm-hand and Starr in the suit of a working-class man who was never entirely comfortable in the group that had become the leading lights of psychedelia.  Lennon’s Daz-white garb, meanwhile, is explained by the fact that his LSD intake at this point was so prodigious he had become genuinely convinced that he was Jesus.  And McCartney was 27 at the time, not 28.

Every other ‘clue’ to this mystery can be easily explained away with basic rationality or the slenderest grip on reality but if you want to head over to http://homepages.tesco.net/harbfamily/opd/index.html and check out such phenomena as the backwards message before ‘Blackbird’ on The White Album or what happens when you put a mirror horizontally through the text ‘Lonely Hearts’ on the front cover of Sgt. Pepper then be my guest  (also, take a trip to the site’s forum for some genuine weapons-grade insanity).  However, to get back to the story, the rumour of McCartney’s demise soon spread around the world until Paul himself had to give an interview to Time Magazine under the headline “I’m Not Dead”.  Evidently the rumour also eventually found it’s way round to DC Comics and issue #222 of Batman was born.

As I’m not as avid a comic reader as some, I’m going to assume that the images of Batman and Robin appearing behind Bruce and Dick when they think about what they could do to solve the mystery as their respective alter-egos are to be taken figuratively and not as actual occurances, otherwise they’d be something of a giveaway.

Well it would appear that Frank Robbins has decided that, so we don’t swerve too close to real life, the Paul character should be re-named Saul and, if his facial hair and dress-sense are anything to go by, changed from a cheery mop-top to an evil magician.  There definitely appears to be an obvious George Harrison clone, and a Lennon lookalike who also looks like he’s a good three decades older than anyone else in the band whilst the artist seems to have forgotten all of Ringo’s distinguishing features like his massive nose and sad eyes and instead decided to base his character on 1972 Olympic swimmer Mark Spitz.  (Also, the car Wayne sends to pick them up appears to be chauffered by M. Bison from Streetfighter II.  Or Cheryl Cole.)

Do Superheroes regularly go pinching stuff from celebrities bedrooms as they sleep just on a hunch?  Don’t they have to get warrants?  It must be hard enough being famous and coping with all the attention without Wonder Woman flying through your window at all hours trying to swipe your toiletry bag in case it’s got blueprints in it or something.  Frankly Robin deserves to be clattered in the back of the head for snooping around like Raffles in latex. And he’s not much cop as a crime fighter if he get’s taken out by someone as fey as a pop star.  The only musicians who it’s acceptable to take a leathering from are the notoriously ‘handy’ Roger Daltrey, Ted Nugent or all 35 members of Earth, Wind and Fire at once.

pid_batman_page08

pid_batman_page09

Now they’re bugging the Twists’ calls!  Even ignoring the fact that they’ve apparently got dressed up as Batman and Robin just to sit around in private listening to other people on the phone this is some seriously unethical behaviour.  No wonder America comes up with Camp X-Ray and friendly fire if they all grow up reading their heroes pissing all over the UN Human Rights Charter with gay abandon.

pid_batman_page10

pid_batman_page11

“They call this a mike- BOOM!”, “Lets make this in STEREO!  I’ve balanced the LEFT channel… now for the RIGHT!”, I can’t help reading lines like that and picturing Robin sat alone at night trying to think of every possible arena for him to have a scrap and then trying to think of things he’d find there to attack people with and then an appropriate one-liner to accompany it- something akin to a cross between Jackie Chan and Emo Phillips.  I like to think that similar lines to these spoken by Robin were uttered by Phil Spector when he attacked the various musicians who’ve had the opportunity to work with him through the years.  But not when he shot that woman as that would be in extraordinarily bad taste.

pid_batman_page13

That tape recorder must be made of kevlar or something!  That’s the second person it’s been used to batter and there’s not a scratch on it.  Try that with an I-pod and you’ll be picking bits of white plastic out of the carpet for months.

Let me get this straight- Saul has perpetrated fraud on a massive scale and get’s adulation-a-plenty on the final page whilst Glennan/Chumley, who’s only apparent crime was smacking Robin over the head whilst the Boy Wonder was in the middle of robbing a sleeping house guest is last seen being man-handled out of the door- no doubt en-route to a life in solitary!  Can’t help but think the writer of this particular comic was more a McCartney fan than a Lennon one.  In fact it wouldn’t surprise me if Mark Chapman had a copy of this issue stuck in his bag between the gun and Catcher in the Rye…

NEXT WEEK:  Iron Man meets The Bee Gees

Prince Among Men

Here’s a conversation from the late eighties that probably never happened but I like to imagine it did:

Executive 1: You know that Batman film we’re doing?
Executive 2: Yeah
Executive 1: I reckon we need a big, famous artist to do the soundtrack.
Executive 2: Good idea. Who?
Executive 1: Well, I’ve been thinking- it’s an adpatation of a comic that’s quite gothic.
Executive 2: Yeah
Executive 1: And Tim Burton’s directing, and he’s got quite a gothic style.
Executive 2: True
Executive 1: And it’s set in Gotham City.
Executive 2: Right
Executive 1: So we’ve got a gothic comic, gothic director, Gotham City- you know who I’m thinking for the soundtrack?
Executive 2: Who?
Executive 1: Prince
Executive 2: Er, that little black fella who did ‘Raspberry Beret’?
Executive 1: Yes!
Executive 2: Oh. I thought you were going to say, maybe, Trent Reznor or Bauhaus or someone like that.
Executive 1: No way, have you heard ‘Little Red Corvette’?

Of course, whoever picked Prince to do the Batman soundtrack is a canny operator indeed- it gave His Royal Purpleness the perfect opportunity to add another string to his small but perfectly formed bow. A while ago, I wrote on here about the spectacular body-swerve that saw Paul Weller leave behind the Jam’s taut, punky attack for the euro-cafe Jazz leanings of The Style Council. Well that’s the sort of change in tack that Prince seems to have spent much of his career going through about three times on an average afternoon.

This isn’t to say that most Prince albums don’t have unifying themes. They do, and they’re wide in scope from ‘Dirty Mind’ (sex), to ‘Around The World In A Day’ (psychedelic whimsy, sex) to ‘The Gold Experience’ (religion, sex) to ‘Sign O’ The Times’ (state of the world, sex). In fact, in the 4 minutes of the latter’s title track he covers more lyrical ground than Bob Dylan, the man who is meant to be pop music’s maestro of reinvention.

That title bestowed on Dylan is, of course, utter bobbins. Dylan has spent 43 albums (at the last count) moving from “Here’s some wry observations about the world” to “I’ve had a bike crash” to “I’m getting divorced” to “I’ve found God” to “No I haven’t” to “Bugger, I might die soon” and Prince pretty much covers all of that in the first 4 minutes of Purple Rain. He doesn’t have a bike crash during that song but the film had a nifty motorcycle in it which is close enough. The reason for Dylan’s canonization is pretty obvious, he’s a pretentious wordsmith and staggeringly sluggish musician and therefore the perfect hero for every rock journalist who thinks they could be the next James Joyce but could never master the riff to ‘Waterfall’. If they make the lyrics more important than the music, they’ll feel a bit better about themselves.

Prince meanwhile can play more instruments than Roy Castle, as well as dancing much better, and he pushed lyrical boundaries to such a level that he single handedly caused Tipper Gore in 1985 to create the ‘Parental Advisory’ sticker in outrage at ‘Darling Nikki’ “masturbating with a magazine”. We can only assume she wasn’t paying attention 3 years earlier when, on ‘Sister’, Prince sang about incest being “not all it seems” as an 16 year old boy got jiggy with his elder sibling. You never got that with ‘Blonde on Blonde’.

Dylan, on the other hand, makes me think of old cars. It seems that Dylan afficionados think that the relationship between musician and fans, whereby the artist puts all the effort into making music and therefore get paid handsomely from the pockets of the audience, should be turned on it’s head and it is, in fact, the duty of the listener to put all the work into consuming Bob’s tunes as they figure out what the hell he’s banging on about as they sit through, for example, eight long minutes of Visions of Johanna. The only other type of person in society who puts such effort into an otherwise easy task is the classic car enthusiast- who considers that getting from A to B in a comfortable hatchback is a waste of time when one can arrive there two hours late, covered in oil and ready to regale all present with tales of broken gaskets.

I have a friend afflicted by this particular condition and he once arrived somewhat tardily to a party and explained, quite cooly, that he had been held up when his car developed “a small fire”. For me, a man used to such modern motoring comforts as electric windscreen wipers and a CD player that’s audible over the engine, I believe size is no issue when it comes to a fire accompanying you in what is essentially a metal box powered by highly flammable liquid. The only scale it can be measured on begins at ‘no fire’ and only goes up one notch to ‘Oh fucking shit!’. For every classic car enthusiast up to his elbows in engine parts on the side of the A40, there’s a Dylan fan listening to something from his infamous eighties output.

The crossover between classic car enthusiasts and Bob Dylan’s fans continues when nationality is brought into play. The motorists are forever in thrall to Triumph Dolomites and Lotus Europas because British cars never sold abroad very much whilst foreign makers continued to make inroads into our markets year after year and this gets them very upset and defensive. Similarly, Americans have always been rather upset that the Beatles (and The Stones and Led Zep) were British and therefore they went looking for an American to place firmly at the centre of popular music whilst Elvis was busy making dreadful movies. This happened in the mid-60s, right around the time John Lennon started saying Dylan was influencing him strongly and bingo! the Yanks had their man. It’s worth pointing out that in the same period as eulogising His Bobness, Lennon was also so mashed on LSD he convened a meeting to let the rest of The Beatles know he was Jesus, so it’s fair to say his judgement at this time can’t be entirely trusted but that didn’t stop Americans deciding that Bob was lord of all he surveyed and from them on everything he did was a monument to his towering genius.

Well, lets have a close look at a few of Bob’s career landmarks. Modern rock was truly invented, so Rollign Stone magazine would have you believe, when Dylan decided to go electric in 1965, dumping his acoustic guitar for a Fender Stratocaster and angering the entire folk movement. This, apparently, was a very brave thing to do. However, it is worth reconsidering this supposed bravery when you remember that the people he upset spent much of the 1960s ripping up their Vietnam draft papers and being pacifists. It’s highly likely they wouldn’t be much cop if it came down to a fight- especially one over an instrument that had already been toted by such noted hard-nuts as Hank Marvin and Buddy Holly.

Later that year, DA Pennebaker followed Dylan around the UK for the documentary ‘Don’t Look Back’. In this, Bob is said to set the archetype for the modern rock star by being surly with journalists and looking blankly at everyone and everything. Far from pioneering the artists of the future as he blazes a trail through these isles, what the documentary actually turns out to be is an hour and a half in the company of a man so stoned he probably only swtiched to an electric guitar cause he liked the colours. Much is made of how much Bob looks bored and desperate in this film whilst travelling through such places as Nottingham and Devon, but this is much more to do with Nottingham and Devon than it is Bob.

In 1969, as I’ve alluded to, Bob Dylan, artist, musician, genius, fell off his motorbike and nearly died. He followed this by a prolonged period of isolation in which he stitched himself together again and created the real mystique of Dylan that has continued to this day by becoming a recluse and being a bit odd on the rare times he gave interviews. To be frank, his behaviour since the accident appears to be less a sign of a maverick at work and more a sign of moderate brain damage. And what kind of rock star falls off a motorbike anyway? At least Simon Le Bon made a twat out of himself by pranging a big, expensive yacht.

Fast forward to 1975 and Dylan unleashes his true ‘masterpiece’, ‘Blood on the Tracks’ as he splits from his wife Sara. Three points need to be made clear about this album:

1. I defy anyone who doesn’t actually know the story behind it to figure out it’s actually all about the end of a marriage on the first listening
2. Once you penetrate the lyrics, it turns out Bob’s a bit of a bastard
3. Dolly Parton did much better work on the subject with ‘D.I.V.O.R.C.E.’

If you’re reading all this and thinking I hate all Bob Dylan’s music, you’d be wrong. He’s done some good stuff- Like A Rolling Stone, Subterranean Homesick Blues, Rainy Day Women #19 & #35- but his hit rate’s appaling and he sings like he’s had a cold for 40 years. And, there is never, EVER, any need for that much harmonica. But, to crank up the automotive theme again, there’s one reason alone why I’ll always worship at the purple altar of Prince while Mr Zimmerman leaves me cold. They’re both massively influential artists, they’ve both shown great longevity and they’re both genuine auteurs in the world of popular music.

But only one of them has ever sung about the Batmobile.