That Was The Year That Will Be

It’s that time of the year again where every newspaper, website, magazine, pamphlet, TV show and idiot-with-a-keyboard in whatever field produce their end of year awards or lists.  You know the sort of thing- ’50 Best Albums of the Year’, ’25 Best Movie Scenes of 2009′, ‘The Top 10 Shows Which Are A Bit Like Flash-Forward, But Aren’t Flash-Forward’ and, being a decent sort, I’ll sum them all up for you right now and save you the time of actually reading them.
The Resistance by Muse, Jade Goody R.I.P., Roger Federer’s French Open Final, That Scene From ‘Bruno’ On The Talk Show, Roy Cropper in a Canal, Michael Jackson, Thierry Henry’s hand, Michael Jackson, Barack Obama, Michael Jackson, The 4th Series of 30 Rock, House is in a Mental Asylum!, A Creeping Sense of Existentialist Dread, Michael McIntyre, Jedward, Jedward, Does Anyone Else Feeling This Gnawing Emptiness?, Fucking Bono.
There you go.  Done.  That was 2009 which, if it had a unifying theme, was essentially 2008 with more resonant celebrity deaths.  And now that it’s out of the way and I’ve summed it all up for you we can get on to job of dishing out next year’s awards- a process rendered infinitely more fun that for 2009 as it’s based on a combination of idle speculation, crackpot brainstorming and desperately chased hunches.  And so, ladies and gentleman, 13 months early, I present The ItSaysHere 2010 Awards…
Album of the Year- ‘Susan Boyle’s Second Album By Susan Boyle’- Susan Boyle:  Boyle won 14 Grammys, 8 Brit Awards and sold 47 million copies of this, her 2nd album, on which she presents a stirring collection of touching but powerful cover versions of her favourite touching but powerful Leona Lewis cover versions.  Bonus Track:  Leona Lewis and Susan Boyle cover Will Young and Gareth Gates’ cover of ‘The Long And Winding Road’.
Film of the Year- ‘Paedophil’- Sascha Baron Cohen trawls across America’s deep south in the guise of a convicted child sex offender called Philip.  Spends all his time making incredibly insensitive comments about any children in his vicinity and offering to buy an hour of delirious sexual pleasure with any passing kids by negotiating with thier parents in a thick Belgian accent and outrageous hat thereby making a point about the reactionary nature of many Americans but actually just proving that Baron Cohen can do funny voices and is happy to risk getting his head kicked in.
TV Show of the Year- ‘The X Factor Election Special 2010′- Hosted by Dermot O’Leary and David Dimbleby, the nation goes to the polls to decide who will occupy 10 Downing Street next year with a mandate to ease Britain through difficult economic times and increasing European intergration as well as a 1 year record deal with Simon Cowell.  The public vote and Peter Snow’s ‘Swing-o-meter’ will decide the final two before they go before the judges panel (Cowell, Louis Walsh, Cheryl Cole, Diane Abbott MP, Ian Hislop) for a vote-off.  They both get to make one final impassioned speech to the nation, highlight 3 manifesto policies of their choice and perform their favourite Rod Stewart song before the winner is announced and the Queen joins them onstage to plug her latest single and ask them to form a government.
Sportsman of the Year-  Thierry Henry- Redeems himself for his handball against the Irish by not only guiding the French to World Cup glody but also winning Strictly Come Dancing- beating Greg Wallace from Masterchef in the final foxtrot round- and also starring in the greatest Gillette advert ever with Tiger Woods who everyone’s been looking at a bit funny since that car crash.  Not that anything happened in that car crash, you understand.  I’m just saying.  I mean, they don’t crash themselves do they?  And what was he doing out at that time of the night anyway?  Two words- Geroge Michael.  That’s all I’m saying.  Just that.
Fiction Book of the Year- ‘Flags and Giraffes’ by Eileen O’Murray- Utterly pretentious load of shit which features no discernable plot whatsoever, has hardly any interesting or likeable characters, is sprinkled with swear words and descriptions of drug taking to try to seem edgy, and is mostly told from the perspective of a narrator who is needlessly cryptic and moany.  Is easily battered in terms of originality, ideas, interest and sheer story-telling ability by every single comic produced this year but everyone on Newsnight Review is terrified that they’ll be struck of the list of pretentious clever-clogs for even admitting they’ve heard of Superman.  Throughout 2010 comics will remain so hopelessly uncool that not even Will Self will pretend to like them ironically to annoy The Guardian.
Non-Fiction Book of the Year- ‘Battered in the Pants’ by Jim Hell- A publishing milestone as, after years of misery memoirs clogging up the nations’ bookshelves and being bought by an apparently multi-million strong population of unsettling voyeurs, this represents the first book to be written by someone who actively set out to get abused as a child knowing the lucrative career that would follow as a writer in later years.  This particularly harrowing tale of constantly going to the vicars house in a tight shorts and a vest top to take showers while asking for help in finding the soap will move even the most hardened psychopath to tears.
Celebrity of the Year- Robbie Williams- Scores a major hit in all the celebrity magazines and websites by finally reuniting on stage with Take That.  His decision to patch things up with Gary Barlow was, he says, a really special moment for him and not in any way to do with the fact that they now sell more records than him and is entirely unconnected to the reality that he’ll suddenly get a bit of an attention spike in a career that was rapidly plummeting downhill while his former bandmates about whom he’d not shown the slightest interest in the last near-decade were suddenly the biggest act in Britain again.
News Event of the Year- The End of the World As Gabriel’s Trumpet Sounds, The Rivers Run With Blood and War, Famine, Pestilence and Death Stalk The Land.  All in HD on Sky News!

It’s that time of the year again where every newspaper, website, magazine, pamphlet, TV show and idiot-with-a-keyboard in whatever field produce their end of year awards and lists.  You know the sort of thing- ’50 Best Albums of the Year’, ’25 Best Movie Scenes of 2009′, ‘The Top 10 Shows Which Are A Bit Like Flash-Forward, But Aren’t Flash-Forward’ and, being a decent sort, I’ll sum them all up for you right now and save you the time of actually reading any of them.

The Resistance by Muse, Jade Goody R.I.P., Roger Federer’s French Open Final, That Scene From ‘Bruno’ On The Talk Show, Roy Cropper in a Canal, Michael Jackson, Thierry Henry’s Hand, Michael Jackson, Barack Obama, Michael Jackson, The 4th Series of 30 Rock, House is in a Mental Asylum!, A Creeping Sense of Existentialist Dread, Michael McIntyre, Jedward, Jedward, Does Anyone Else Feeling This Gnawing Emptiness?, Fucking Bono.

There you go.  Done.  That was 2009 which, if it had a unifying theme, was essentially 2008 with more resonant celebrity deaths.  And now that it’s out of the way and I’ve summed it all up for you we can get on to job of dishing out next year’s awards.  Yes, just for you, I’m going to get the jump on absoultely everybody else on the planet and give you the highlights of 2010 before they even have a chance to happen.  Doing this is a process rendered infinitely more fun than doing it for 2009 as it’s based on a combination of idle speculation, crackpot brainstorming and desperately chased hunches.  And so, ladies and gentleman, 13 months early, I present The ItSaysHere 2010 Awards…

Album of the Year- ‘Susan Boyle’s Second Album By Susan Boyle’- Susan Boyle:  Boyle won 14 Grammys, 8 Brit Awards and sold 47 million copies of this, her 2nd album, on which she presents a stirring collection of touching but powerful cover versions of her favourite touching but powerful Leona Lewis cover versions.  Bonus Track:  Leona Lewis and Susan Boyle cover Will Young and Gareth Gates’ cover of ‘The Long And Winding Road’.

Film of the Year- ‘Paedophil’- Sascha Baron Cohen trawls across America’s deep south in the guise of a convicted child sex offender called Philip.  Spends all his time making incredibly insensitive comments about any children in his vicinity and offering to buy an hour of delirious sexual pleasure with any passing kids by negotiating with their parents in a thick Belgian accent and outrageous hat, thereby making a point about the reactionary nature of many Americans but actually just proving that Baron Cohen can do funny voices and is happy to risk getting his head kicked in.

TV Show of the Year- ‘The X Factor Election Special 2010- Hosted by Dermot O’Leary and David Dimbleby, the nation goes to the polls to decide who will occupy 10 Downing Street next year with a mandate to ease Britain through difficult economic times and increasing European intergration as well as a 1 year record deal with Simon Cowell.  The public vote and Peter Snow’s ‘Swing-o-meter’ will decide the final two before they go before the judges panel (Cowell, Louis Walsh, Cheryl Cole, Diane Abbott MP, Ian Hislop) for a vote-off.  They both get to make one final impassioned speech to the nation, highlight 3 manifesto policies of their choice and perform their favourite Rod Stewart song before the winner is announced and the Queen joins them onstage to plug her latest single and ask them to form a government.

Sportsman of the Year-  Thierry Henry- Redeems himself for his handball against the Irish by not only guiding the French to World Cup glory but also winning Strictly Come Dancing- beating Greg Wallace from Masterchef in the final foxtrot round- and also starring in the greatest Gillette advert ever with Tiger Woods who everyone’s been looking at a bit funny since that car crash.  Not that anything happened in that car crash, you understand.  I’m just saying;  I mean, they don’t crash themselves do they?  And what was he doing out at that time of the night anyway?  Two words- Geroge Michael.  That’s all I’m saying.  Just that.

Fiction Book of the Year- ‘Flags and Giraffes’ by Eileen O’Murray- Utterly pretentious load of shit which features no discernable plot whatsoever, has hardly any interesting or likeable characters, is sprinkled with swear words and descriptions of drug taking to try to seem edgy, and is mostly told from the perspective of a narrator who is needlessly cryptic and moany and who you wouldn’t piss on if they were on fire.  Is easily battered in terms of originality, ideas, interest and sheer story-telling ability by every single comic produced this year but everyone on Newsnight Review is terrified that they’ll be struck of the list of pretentious clever-clogs for even admitting they’ve heard of Superman.  Throughout 2010 comics will remain so hopelessly uncool that not even Will Self will pretend to like them ironically to annoy The Guardian.

Non-Fiction Book of the Year- ‘Battered in the Pants’ by Jim Hell- A publishing milestone as, after years of misery memoirs clogging up the nations’ bookshelves and being bought by an apparently multi-million strong population of unsettling voyeurs, this represents the first book to be written by someone who actively set out to get abused as a child knowing the lucrative career that would follow as a writer in later years.  This particularly harrowing tale of constantly going to the vicar’s house in tight shorts and a vest top to take showers while asking for help in finding the soap will move even the most hardened page-twitching psychopath to tears.

Celebrity of the Year- Robbie Williams- Scores a major hit in all the celebrity magazines and websites by finally reuniting on stage with Take That.  His decision to patch things up with Gary Barlow was, he says, a really special moment and not in any way to do with the fact that they now sell more records than him and is entirely unconnected to the reality that he’ll suddenly get a bit of an attention spike in a career that was rapidly plummeting downhill while his former bandmates about whom he’d not shown the slightest interest in the last near-decade were suddenly the biggest act in Britain again.

News Event of the Year- The End of the World As Gabriel’s Trumpet Sounds, The Rivers Run With Blood and War, Famine, Pestilence and Death Stalk The Land. All in HD on Sky News!

No Sex Please, We’re Reading

“This was not soft porn. This was no longer two unclothed women caressing and kissing on a bed. There was something primitive about it now, this woman-on-woman violence, as though in the room filled with shadows, Pegeen were a magical composite of shaman, acrobat, and animal. It was as if she were wearing a mask on her genitals, a weird totem mask, that made her into what she was not and was not supposed to be. There was something dangerous about it. His heart thumped with excitement – the god Pan looking on from a distance with his spying, lascivious gaze.”

And that bit doesn’t even mention the huge green dildo…

The above passage is Philip Roth’s entry (no pun inteded) in this year’s Literary Review Bad Sex Award- a trinket designed to “draw attention to the cruse, tasteless… passages of sexual description in the modern novel”.  It’s also the one award that usually affords new up-and-coming novellists the chance to take on the true heavyweights of their field.  A chap called Anthony Quinn, for instance, is on this year’s list for his debut novel which means he’s gone from writing film reviews for The Independent to duking it out with both a legend like Roth and Australian doom-monger/Droopy impersonator Nick Cave for an award which only 2 years ago was posthumously scooped by Norman Mailer.

The sheer breadth of talent and experience on display in the list (Richard Milward’s ‘Ten Storey Love Song’- another nominee- might be the worst book ever written) just goes to prove one thing for certain- nobody, no matter who they are, should ever attempt to write about the sexual act.

Ever.

Returning to Roth as an example, he’s had half a century to nail (no pun intended) a decent description of sex since he wrote “her breasts swam towards me like two pink-nosed fish and she let me hold them” in ‘Goodbye, Columbus‘ but as his most recent attempt demonstrates, all he’s really been able to do in 50 years is ramp up the deranged imagery and filter everything through what appears to be either a compound nervous breakdown or a major psychotic episode.

The basic problem appears to be this:  the author wishing to describe the act of physical sex-doing is going to have to confront some intense physical and mental sensations achieved via some frankly ludicrous bodily actions by the participants.  Removed from the pleasure of involvement or the onanistic joys of watching attractive people enjoying it, sex is a mostly preposterous activity involving thrusting, odd primal noises and face pulling that wouldn’t look out of place in a documentary about people having their feet run over by heavy machinery.

A writer is therefore faced with a stark choice.  Option 1 is to write about sex with brutal frankness and simplicity.  This would make a novel feel like a school biology textbook and therefore be about as erotic as the instructions for assembling a piece of flat-pack furniture that begin with ‘insert rod A into slot B and secure with nuts provided’ (no pun intended)

Option 2 meanwhile involves cloaking the description with similes, metaphors and symbolism until it resembles less an erotically charged missive from Planet Orgasm and more the demented ramblings of a couped-up prisoner of war who’s spent 4 solid decades thinking constantly about a shag but has had nothing but a dusty hole in the ground and a potato sack on which to take out his frenzied yearnings.  This is the approached favoured by most writers and of which Roth’s earlier passage is a particularly fine example.

Neither of these options seems particularly viable or attractive and that’s why I feel that, while the bad sex award is a step in the right direction, it doesn’t go nearly far enough.  Any description of sex in novels should henceforth be banned before any other truly great writer like Philip Roth shags up their reputation (no pun intended) by claiming that women involved in sex acts with huge green dildoes are also wearing masks on their fannies.

In defence of the art of writing about sex, Richard Milward (he of the appalling ‘Ten Storey Love Song’) said that “some authors spend five pages describing a walk in the park but when it comes to sex they’ll just do two sentences- ‘she rolled off him’.  Sex is exciting stuff- it can be very dirty and smelly.  But you’ve got to get stuck in”.

No pun intended.

Leaving aside his descrpition of sex as ‘smelly’ in the folder marked ‘Too Much Information’, Milward totally misses the point about what should and shouldn’t be described.  If a couple in a novel actually have sex the reader’s imagination should be able to fill in the blanks, as it were, rather than the author ruining everything with a combination of cack-handed imagery and punishing detail.  To illustrate my point, let’s turn to the world of film.

It might be a cliche to say it, but cinema doesn’t get any more erotic and powerful that the image of Burt Lancaster and Deborah Kerr rolling around on the beach in From Here to Eternity.  They are utterly consumed with each other and, let’s be frank here, it’s clearly the prelude to the best shag in the world.  Lancaster is about to do things to Kerr that none of us would be proud of but which will live with both of them forever.  It’s gonna get nasty.  There’ll be animal noises.  It might hurt.  Your imaginations can fill in the rest (provided their like mine that is)

But does the film show us this?  No.  We just get the kiss in the sand, not the eye-watering fuck-fest that inevitably follows.  And that’s why it’s such an erotically charged moment.  Fast forward 40 years and cinema’s desperate attempts to be erotic involved filming right up  Sharon Stone’s skirt so you could see her lady regions.  Even without the fat bloke from Seinfeld and Jurassic Park sweating away it wasn’t in the slightest bit erotic or arousing.  It was just a fanny.

But at least it wasn’t wearing a mask.

Prince Among Men

Here’s a conversation from the late eighties that probably never happened but I like to imagine it did:

Executive 1: You know that Batman film we’re doing?
Executive 2: Yeah
Executive 1: I reckon we need a big, famous artist to do the soundtrack.
Executive 2: Good idea. Who?
Executive 1: Well, I’ve been thinking- it’s an adpatation of a comic that’s quite gothic.
Executive 2: Yeah
Executive 1: And Tim Burton’s directing, and he’s got quite a gothic style.
Executive 2: True
Executive 1: And it’s set in Gotham City.
Executive 2: Right
Executive 1: So we’ve got a gothic comic, gothic director, Gotham City- you know who I’m thinking for the soundtrack?
Executive 2: Who?
Executive 1: Prince
Executive 2: Er, that little black fella who did ‘Raspberry Beret’?
Executive 1: Yes!
Executive 2: Oh. I thought you were going to say, maybe, Trent Reznor or Bauhaus or someone like that.
Executive 1: No way, have you heard ‘Little Red Corvette’?

Of course, whoever picked Prince to do the Batman soundtrack is a canny operator indeed- it gave His Royal Purpleness the perfect opportunity to add another string to his small but perfectly formed bow. A while ago, I wrote on here about the spectacular body-swerve that saw Paul Weller leave behind the Jam’s taut, punky attack for the euro-cafe Jazz leanings of The Style Council. Well that’s the sort of change in tack that Prince seems to have spent much of his career going through about three times on an average afternoon.

This isn’t to say that most Prince albums don’t have unifying themes. They do, and they’re wide in scope from ‘Dirty Mind’ (sex), to ‘Around The World In A Day’ (psychedelic whimsy, sex) to ‘The Gold Experience’ (religion, sex) to ‘Sign O’ The Times’ (state of the world, sex). In fact, in the 4 minutes of the latter’s title track he covers more lyrical ground than Bob Dylan, the man who is meant to be pop music’s maestro of reinvention.

That title bestowed on Dylan is, of course, utter bobbins. Dylan has spent 43 albums (at the last count) moving from “Here’s some wry observations about the world” to “I’ve had a bike crash” to “I’m getting divorced” to “I’ve found God” to “No I haven’t” to “Bugger, I might die soon” and Prince pretty much covers all of that in the first 4 minutes of Purple Rain. He doesn’t have a bike crash during that song but the film had a nifty motorcycle in it which is close enough. The reason for Dylan’s canonization is pretty obvious, he’s a pretentious wordsmith and staggeringly sluggish musician and therefore the perfect hero for every rock journalist who thinks they could be the next James Joyce but could never master the riff to ‘Waterfall’. If they make the lyrics more important than the music, they’ll feel a bit better about themselves.

Prince meanwhile can play more instruments than Roy Castle, as well as dancing much better, and he pushed lyrical boundaries to such a level that he single handedly caused Tipper Gore in 1985 to create the ‘Parental Advisory’ sticker in outrage at ‘Darling Nikki’ “masturbating with a magazine”. We can only assume she wasn’t paying attention 3 years earlier when, on ‘Sister’, Prince sang about incest being “not all it seems” as an 16 year old boy got jiggy with his elder sibling. You never got that with ‘Blonde on Blonde’.

Dylan, on the other hand, makes me think of old cars. It seems that Dylan afficionados think that the relationship between musician and fans, whereby the artist puts all the effort into making music and therefore get paid handsomely from the pockets of the audience, should be turned on it’s head and it is, in fact, the duty of the listener to put all the work into consuming Bob’s tunes as they figure out what the hell he’s banging on about as they sit through, for example, eight long minutes of Visions of Johanna. The only other type of person in society who puts such effort into an otherwise easy task is the classic car enthusiast- who considers that getting from A to B in a comfortable hatchback is a waste of time when one can arrive there two hours late, covered in oil and ready to regale all present with tales of broken gaskets.

I have a friend afflicted by this particular condition and he once arrived somewhat tardily to a party and explained, quite cooly, that he had been held up when his car developed “a small fire”. For me, a man used to such modern motoring comforts as electric windscreen wipers and a CD player that’s audible over the engine, I believe size is no issue when it comes to a fire accompanying you in what is essentially a metal box powered by highly flammable liquid. The only scale it can be measured on begins at ‘no fire’ and only goes up one notch to ‘Oh fucking shit!’. For every classic car enthusiast up to his elbows in engine parts on the side of the A40, there’s a Dylan fan listening to something from his infamous eighties output.

The crossover between classic car enthusiasts and Bob Dylan’s fans continues when nationality is brought into play. The motorists are forever in thrall to Triumph Dolomites and Lotus Europas because British cars never sold abroad very much whilst foreign makers continued to make inroads into our markets year after year and this gets them very upset and defensive. Similarly, Americans have always been rather upset that the Beatles (and The Stones and Led Zep) were British and therefore they went looking for an American to place firmly at the centre of popular music whilst Elvis was busy making dreadful movies. This happened in the mid-60s, right around the time John Lennon started saying Dylan was influencing him strongly and bingo! the Yanks had their man. It’s worth pointing out that in the same period as eulogising His Bobness, Lennon was also so mashed on LSD he convened a meeting to let the rest of The Beatles know he was Jesus, so it’s fair to say his judgement at this time can’t be entirely trusted but that didn’t stop Americans deciding that Bob was lord of all he surveyed and from them on everything he did was a monument to his towering genius.

Well, lets have a close look at a few of Bob’s career landmarks. Modern rock was truly invented, so Rollign Stone magazine would have you believe, when Dylan decided to go electric in 1965, dumping his acoustic guitar for a Fender Stratocaster and angering the entire folk movement. This, apparently, was a very brave thing to do. However, it is worth reconsidering this supposed bravery when you remember that the people he upset spent much of the 1960s ripping up their Vietnam draft papers and being pacifists. It’s highly likely they wouldn’t be much cop if it came down to a fight- especially one over an instrument that had already been toted by such noted hard-nuts as Hank Marvin and Buddy Holly.

Later that year, DA Pennebaker followed Dylan around the UK for the documentary ‘Don’t Look Back’. In this, Bob is said to set the archetype for the modern rock star by being surly with journalists and looking blankly at everyone and everything. Far from pioneering the artists of the future as he blazes a trail through these isles, what the documentary actually turns out to be is an hour and a half in the company of a man so stoned he probably only swtiched to an electric guitar cause he liked the colours. Much is made of how much Bob looks bored and desperate in this film whilst travelling through such places as Nottingham and Devon, but this is much more to do with Nottingham and Devon than it is Bob.

In 1969, as I’ve alluded to, Bob Dylan, artist, musician, genius, fell off his motorbike and nearly died. He followed this by a prolonged period of isolation in which he stitched himself together again and created the real mystique of Dylan that has continued to this day by becoming a recluse and being a bit odd on the rare times he gave interviews. To be frank, his behaviour since the accident appears to be less a sign of a maverick at work and more a sign of moderate brain damage. And what kind of rock star falls off a motorbike anyway? At least Simon Le Bon made a twat out of himself by pranging a big, expensive yacht.

Fast forward to 1975 and Dylan unleashes his true ‘masterpiece’, ‘Blood on the Tracks’ as he splits from his wife Sara. Three points need to be made clear about this album:

1. I defy anyone who doesn’t actually know the story behind it to figure out it’s actually all about the end of a marriage on the first listening
2. Once you penetrate the lyrics, it turns out Bob’s a bit of a bastard
3. Dolly Parton did much better work on the subject with ‘D.I.V.O.R.C.E.’

If you’re reading all this and thinking I hate all Bob Dylan’s music, you’d be wrong. He’s done some good stuff- Like A Rolling Stone, Subterranean Homesick Blues, Rainy Day Women #19 & #35- but his hit rate’s appaling and he sings like he’s had a cold for 40 years. And, there is never, EVER, any need for that much harmonica. But, to crank up the automotive theme again, there’s one reason alone why I’ll always worship at the purple altar of Prince while Mr Zimmerman leaves me cold. They’re both massively influential artists, they’ve both shown great longevity and they’re both genuine auteurs in the world of popular music.

But only one of them has ever sung about the Batmobile.

High Five

You may not have heard of Eugene O’Neill but you’ll probably know his most famous quote- “There is no present or future, only the past, happening over and over again”. It seems I’ve reached the age where I can appreciate that statement in the context of my own life- as well as the probable reason why the guy who wrote it spent much of his life in an alcoholic stupor. For example, I went to the cinema for the first time in ages this past weekend to see ‘Frost/Nixon’ and it occurred to me that I only seem to intensively trot to the kino these days in the first few months of the year- when the cinemas are stuffed with moral-heavy, well-acted award snafflers which no mouthy teen-spawn go to see and then talk through and when there’s no chance of inadvertantly seeing anything directed by Tony Scott. In the next few days and weeks I’m looking forward to seeing ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ (SPOILER ALERT: Brad Pitt is born as an elderly man with a face made entirely out of special effects, ages backwards, learns valuable life lessons, loses Oscar to the bloke out of ’9 1/2 Weeks’) and ‘The Damned United’ (since I’ve not seen a film featuring Michael Sheen as a famous British figure since, well last weekend actually) among others before I head to the I-MAX to see ‘Watchmen’ and begin my self-imposed exile till 2010 and another blissful few weeks of twat-free cinema audiences.

It seems logical to assume that mankind will never be able to muck about with O’Neill’s succinct little phrase by cracking the ability to travel through time. If we were to manage it at any point in the dim and distant future surely some intrepid explorer from then would have arrived in the present by now to let us know that we’ll get there in the end and to keep on trying. They’d probably have seen the credit crunch coming too and warned us about that as well. And it would have been nice of them to also let us know just how bad the third series of Skins would turn out to be. This is all assuming, of course, that they aren’t all familiar with the Back to the Future trilogy- especially it’s extraordinarily dark second chapter- and have decided it’s best to leave us to our own devices and not go fiddling round with the past (although it’s hard to think of an apocalyptic time-bent future which is any worse that a world that has the third series of Skins in it).

On the subject of Back to the Future- how the hell did they get away with all that?! The first one’s essentially a tale of era-hopping incest while the second installment ups the ante by covering domestic abuse and alcoholism and then wrapping it all up in a cautionary tale of dreams which have been cruelly shattered to death by fate and consequence. At least they had the good grace to make the final film a knockabout Western romp- though while filming one stunt for it Michael J. Fox was almost accidentally killed by hanging. The more I think about it, the more I think that if Robert Zemeckis considers this to be family entertainment he needs to be put on some sort of register.

I certainly hope I never find myself with the ability to travel through time as I’m pretty sure I’d be hopeless at it. The basic problem would be that I’d find myself faced with far too much choice to deal with- where should I go? When should I go? Who should I meet? What should I witness? And those questions don’t come anywhere near getting into the real issues time travel throws up either. For example I have a ‘freebie’ list of 5 celebrities I’m allowed guilt-free sex with and it took me months to complete when I only had contemporary women to choose from; I know I’d be paralized by indecision for millenia if I could visit the past and suddenly had to figure out who to jettison from the list in order to secure a berth for ‘Walk Like An Egyptian’-era Susanna Hoffs.

My inability to deal with choice is mostly brought into sharp relief when I’m faced with the treasure trove of a Sky+ box. I’m currently writing this at my girlfriend’s parents’ house and, as is so often the case, I’m the last person awake in the house and will probably be sat here into the wee small hours cycling endlessly through 4 quadrillion channels looking for something to watch. However, whereas the famous old cliche is that there’s all these channels and there’s never anything on the grim reality is much, much worse- there’s far too much on and every time I find something I fancy sitting through I get overwhelmed with a fear that there’s something on another channel that I’m prefer to see instead, and so I set off trawling through the channels again until I’ve gone through them all, half an hour has passed and I have to flick through everything again as most of the channels are now showing something different. Intriguingly, if I do land on a particular program for more than a few seconds I’ll find it utterly impossible to sit patiently through a commercial break and start looking through every station again; only to find that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE THOUSANDS OF CHANNELS IS SHOWING COMMERCIALS AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME! It’s a staggering piece of synchronisation from all concerned- whoever it is that makes it happen really ought to commit their talents to running the railways instead.

Anyway…

Perhaps this inability to cope with a plethora of choice is why men like myself love making ‘Top 5′ lists. In ‘High Fidelity’ Nick Hornby seems to suggest that obsession with list-making is what men do when they should be busy considering important things like being all responsible and, if the book’s to be taken literally, getting pussy-whipped by a haughty solicitor. I reckon, however, he’s doing his gender a great disservice here as the Top 5 list is actually a useful way of dealing with the modern world and prioritising what really matters and what you really care about (although, as I’ve proved earlier with my ‘freebie’ list, it’s a media that tends to suffer from information overload if time travelling is brought into the equation).

In fact, speaking as someone who’s filled in more than his fair share of job application forms in the past few months, I reckon asking people a bunch of Top 5 questions is a much better way to shape a workforce than looking at C.V.s and cliched personal statements that state the applicant is ‘a driven, goal-oriented individual’ with ‘excellent team-making skills’ when, if we’re honest, no-ones ever going to write anything truthful like ‘I’m applying for this job because I stole all the stationery in my previous office and sold the bosses Beamer on e-bay when he disciplined me for goosing his wife at the Christmas party’.

If I was inviting applications to work for me, I wouldn’t give a tinker’s cuss about someone’s experience- anyone can be trained to do any job given time- but I would like to know exactly what sort of person I’m inviting to share my workplace for 40 hours a week. If we’re going to be spending that much time together it’s much more important that I find out what they’re top 5 biscuits are and if Prince makes an appearance in their ‘Top 5 Recording Artists of the 1980s’ list.

Everyone’s worked as part of a team where at least 50% of their fellow members are people with whom they don’t share even the tiniest interest or belief and this can’t be bad for employee morale and the performance of any company- especially in ‘these trying times’ ((tm) Practically Every Report on BBC News For The Last 6 Months). People would work much better together if their colleagues and themselves had at least some crossover when in their lists of such things as Top 5 singles, brands of crisp, American teen movie nude scenes, cartoon animals or supervillains.

And, best of all, you can ask people what their Top 5 films are- and if ‘Back To The Future 2′ is on the list you’ll know they’re probably seriously disturbed.