See and Touch Their Bathing Suit Area

So, hello. Where were we? I’ve not done this for a while for plenty of reasons, most of which involve:

a) not being arsed

and

b) the modern world moving on so fast that blogging took a matter of months to stop being even marginally relevant and instead look hopelessly old fashioned and quaint, like David Niven movies or the notion of shame.

However, these are important times and someone needs to be here to document them. Especially as it turns out that both the Mayans and Roland Emmerich were right, humanity- as I think we all suspect but don’t want to say out loud- will crumble to a messy end sometime in 2012. It’s important that a person grasps the mantle of banging on about these end-days at tedious length for whatever civilisation springs up in our place in the distant future, so that’s what I might as well do.

Hello future civilisation if you’re reading. I hope you’re well.

You’re all probably wondering what happened to us all, reading this in the distant future. Well, obviously, I don’t know yet- we’re still here for now, though everyone’s running out of money, pissed off with everything and taking to the streets. We’ll probably just all end up shouting each other to death in a mass orgy of impotent rage. That’ll do it. Or an asteroid, obviously.

Anyway, since the terminal descent of life as we know it into some unknown cataclysm isn’t due until some time in the new year- though hopefully not until after the Olympics as I’ve got tickets- we can turn to More Pressing Affairs.

Today’s More Pressing Affair is ‘textalgia’- a term recently coined by me when I should have been doing something more productive like, for example, absolutely anything else that anyone could care to name. Basically, experiencing ‘textalgia’ is the process of going through old text messages to relive interesting, exciting or funny moments in your recent life. Obviously, that’s if you’re the sort of person whose lives’ interesting, exciting or funny moments involve a beep and a pithy communication from a fellow human which, considering I’m the wrong side of 30 and with little to look forward to beyond Type 2 diabetes, is pretty much me.

Most modern technology is, of course, nothing special. The internet’s great and all that; but really mankind peaked with fire, the wheel, television and garlic paste in a tube. Mobile phones are mostly awful, being as they are merely a way for a man called Alan to interupt me at any time of the night or day and talk about mortgages, but they do hold also allow for the sending, receiving and storing of texts- which is useful for the sort of emotional retard like me who struggles with even the most basic face-to-face dialogue and never has a thought or emotion which needs expressing in more than 160 characters.

Texts are great. This is because phone calls are the preserve of those with bad news to impart or some drudgery to ask. Think about it, when was the last time gave you a ring to say something lovely, like “I know where to find wine” or “please can I do something lovely to your lower bits?”. No, it’s always people asking for money, telling you a family pet/member has died/is ill/is a cow; or its someone called Alan talking about mortgages. If your job involves a phone, you’ll also be aware that it’s simply a portal for whinging rather than the magic device through which someone rings to offer a pay rise or, at the very least, a sandwich.

Now, go on and check your recent texts. I’ll bet that it’s mostly nice stuff in there. Some of it mundane, sure, but possibly signed off with a nice ‘X’ which is more of a kiss than you’ll get on the phone (though that’s probably a good thing- kisses sound weird down the phone, like someone farting in a diving bell). There’ll probably be some really sweet messages in your inbox if you look right now, and definitely something funny. Possibly both if someone managed to recently send you a knock knock joke which also alluded to the fact that they like how you’ve done your hair today (a long shot admittedly but I’m working on it).

The reason texts are nice is because they serve the emotionally stunted section of contemporary society which, as luck would have it, isn’t just me but all of you as well. You want proof? You know that person you really like? With the eyes and the nose and that smile? Them? Desperate to let them know how you feel aren’t you? It wouldn’t be hard to do, would it, face-to-face? You see them enough. You suspect they might fancy you too don’t you? So have you spoken to them? Or given them a call? To tell them?

Of course you bloody well haven’t.

But your inbox is full of slightly flirty text messages pinging back and forth, isn’t it? Because you’re emotionally stunted, so is the other person, and texts at least allow you to think you’re both performing some intricate waltz of attraction when, in fact, you’re just trying to shoehorn into an SMS about shopping in Sainsburys how much you’d like to see and touch their bathing suit area.

I was in that situation once. It went on forever. Until I finally told the girl how I felt. By text. And she responded. By text. We’ve been together nearly 8 years. It could have been longer but, we were just texting back and forth for ages. Like idiots.

Nearly 8 years. Blimey. I should probably marry her. I won’t though.

I couldn’t make the vows fit into a text message.

Beatherder

I went to a festival recently for the first time in a few years. Clearly it’s taken that length of time for me to forget a very important point- I would happily kill 95% of people at any given festival. I’m sure they’re all nice and lovely the rest of the time when their enagaged with normal grinding reality like the rest of us- but stick them in a field with a soundsystem, 48 cans of Stella and access to some industral strength ketamine and everything goes horribly, horribly wrong. They begin communicating at the sort of volume usually associated with a jumbo jet crashing on take-off and decide that 5am is the appropriate time to begin an interpetation of Massive Attack tunes on the bongos to impress a posh girl called something like Iffy.

And these are people I just paid £70 to spend a weekend camping with.

Incredibly, I still had a brilliant time. This is mainly due to the company of friends I don’t see often enough who through a combination of humour, love and understanding managed to smooth the edges off the seething rage that festival people pump into the dense black gloop that’s where my soul should be. Thanks for that guys. Appreciate it.

I was also helped by the fact that festival was everything that Glastonbury always promised to be. Impressive, really, considering that it was a festival called Beatherder I was at and not Glastonbury.

I’ve been down to the big one at Pilton a couple of times and it was great- although as an event it’s so smug and in love with itself that, for one weekend per year, it briefly overtakes Manchester as the cockiest, most-likely-to-harp-on-about-it’s-inherent-greatness place in the UK. If it could fellate itself, it would snap it’s wonderful, oh-so-cool neck doing it.

Glastonbury is brilliant, no doubt, but it likes to present this image as an insane bacchanale of decadence and music where anything can happen. Rumours always ping around the festival like Twitter after it’s received a blow to the head: “Paul McCartney and Neil Young are in the acoustic tent at 4pm!”, “I’ve just seen Kurt Cobain eat a falafel during The White Lies set”, “Glenn Miller’s plane just crashed through a timehole- he’s playing on the Pyramid Stage with Slash”- that sort of thing. The chinese whispers about what’s going on in the awful, rubbish, not-at-Glastonbury outside world are even more insane. Apparently, when news spread about Michael Jackson’s death last year it took about 30 minutes flat for the rumour to mutate into news of every single celebrity called Michael having passed away in the night; Barrymore, Buerk, Jordan, McIntyre, Portillo in a freak yachting tragedy etc, etc. And what really happens that’s a surprise? Bugger all.

Oh, and those festival twats I mentioned earlier? There’s 175,000 of the fuckers.

The truth about Glastonbury, and what actually makes it great, is that it’s lots of bands you’ve heard of playing tightly scheduled sets to ensure they get some coverage on the BBC. That and the fact that Lauren Laverne’s there.

Beatherder, this past weekend, meanwhile turned out to herald all the unexpected insanity that Glasto had to stop having when they let the BBC film it and had to put up a massive fence to stop every baghead in Europe from getting in and ransacking tents. Here’s just three things I saw there this year:

- A stall honest enough to advertise that it sells ‘Shit Cameras’
- A talent competition won by a human-beatboxer and judged by, among others, a drag queen and the woman who plays Janice Battersby on Coronation Street.
- A main stage guest appearance from GMTV’s leotard-toting Mr Motivator which featured backing dancing by a friend of mine dressed as Bertie Bassett

This is what festivals are meant to do; remove us from everyday and let us experience a different reality for the weekend. One where there’s lots of drinking, loads of live music and remarkably few consequences. Unfortunately, this also means experiencing the reality of life in a refugee camp for a few days, albeit a refugee camp where half the residents have gorged themselves on cheap speed and spend their time tripping over guy ropes and walking past tents fruitlessly yelling “DAZ!” at the top of their lungs in the hope of finding their friend who went off to have sex with that posh girl called Iffy because, disgracefully, in this alternate festival reality playing Massive Attack on the bongos in a drug induced stupor at 5am actually does get you laid.

And then instead of bongos you’re listening to sweaty tent-rutting for 3 hours as Daz bangs away at Iffy with admirable tenacity yet few results as his substance-addled brain has forgotten to tell his testicles what to do and Iffy passed out in the early stages anyway. The fucking degenerate scum. Maybe one day he’ll rut right through her pelvis and I’ll be woken by the glorious sound of Daz charging round the campsite as his mind finally caves in with all the horror while Iffy flails around in muted agony looking for her severed legs. The shits. The absolute rotting shits.

Er… Anyway, I had a point, can’t remember what it was now.

Um… yeah… I went to a festival this weekend. It was great. I’m just not sure why.

A Little Understanding

It recently occurred to me that I really don’t understand anything. If I had to round up the amount of stuff in the world as a whole that I understand, to the nearest decimal point, it’s probably about 0.001%. And that’s being generous.

Take the foilbles of human behaviour for a kick off. For example, why do the sorts of people who get blacked out windows in their cars to protect their identities from prying eyes (footballers, club promoters, gangsters, bell-ends) also get personalised number plates? Do they actually stand in car dealerships having conversations like:

“Can I get the windows blacked out please- don’t want everyone to know it’s me driving by”
“And the license plate, sir?”
“Can I get R10 FERD please?”

If so, I really don’t understand that. And that’s just the little stuff. What about gravity? I know what it does; but why it does it or how? Nope, not a clue. Don’t understand.

The problem is that when you start thinking like this then, much like spilled shampoo, you can’t ever put your thoughts back in the bottle. Your perception is forever changed- much like losing your virginity or the first time you wake up next to a submachine gun with a blank hole in your memory where last night should be.

Start realising you don’t understand anything and life is no longer something you can confidently skip through with cocky brio. Rather it suddenly becomes a parade of events, concepts and creatures that you can barely hope to even grasp onto the minutest comprehension of. There are plenty of people in the world who look at the average prole with arch superiority and think this level of flailing ignorance is how they exist on a daily basis. This is true, of course, but it’s also true that even the smuggest, most knowing of folk are almost exactly the same in what they really know about anything. The only difference is that a dim person is never likely to realise that they actually know bugger all and will therefore remain in blissful unintellectual simplicity. They don’t read stuff like this. You are doing. They win. Damn.

Let’s move onto the economy. Now that he’s safely installed in 11 Downing Street, alongside the panel saying “In Case of Emergency, Break Vince Cable”, George Osbourne- the bloke in the Tory party that even David Cameron refers to as ‘the posh one’- has to now stop the Government spending any money on anything. This is because the government has a huge national debt to deal with. As does pretty much every other nation on Earth. Some, like Greece, have had to borrow money off people so they can afford to pay them back some other money. This is generally the sort of behaviour associated with men who spend their entire lives in the bookies smelling of sweat and old string, rather than whole sovereign countries.

The thing I don’t understand is this- in any situation where money is owed, there’s usually a debtor, who does the owing, and a debtee who does the borrowing. However, it would appear that absolutely everyone on Earth at the moment is the debtee. Everyone owes someone some money. Lots of money. Now, who the hell do they owe it to? Who’s waiting impatiently and sending out mardy final warning letters addressed to ‘The People and Government of Spain, Spain’?

And if we can find out who this money is owed to, can’t we just all ask them to shut up and wait a while longer? Or just ignore them? After all, I’m going to hazard a guess that there’s more of us than there is of them. I’m pretty sure if we all actually knew who all this cash was owed to, that’s what we’d do. But then again we don’t know, do we? We don’t understand- none of us.

Either that, or all the people in the world who run everything don’t understand how basic economics work. And if that’s the case, then never mind vanity plates and gravity, can you even begin to understand how that happened?

No, me neither.

Welcome to now

So, that was the noughties.  Did you enjoy it?

No, I’m not sure either.  When you really think about it, lots and lots of stuff happened since the Millennium but all I can really remember of the previous decade is that everyone got an i-Phone and then Louis Walsh judged them.  This is probably not a suitable eulogy for 10 years that, logically speaking, should represent the pinnacle of all human achievement and existence thus far.

Actually, I do genuinely believe that humanity is constantly achieving greater and greater feats of excellence as time goes on but, unlike those who think this is represented by all those clever people and their big pipe in the ground at CERN, I reckon our species has thus far peaked with the Shea Stadium level of Beatles Rock Band played with the Rickenbacker controller.

Anyway, leaving the noughties behind us it’s time to boldly embark on a new year and a new decade (technically, it actually isn’t as pedants like to point out, the new decade starts with 2011 just as the Millennium actually started with 2001.  Don’t worry about it though, people who think like this are an evil on par with ethnic cleansing).  However before we get down to it this upcoming year and decade need something really quite important.

They need naming.

First of all, are we in 2010 or 2010?  I’d probably better do that in words rather than numbers.  Are we in two-thousand-and-ten or is it twenty-ten?  Personally, I favour twenty-ten, it sounds more futuristic and and while me might not all be whizzing around on hover-boards or watching Jenny Agutter undress while we run away from a chap called Francis and the ritual of Carrousel it’s at least nice to pretend we could be by giving our years more sci-fi sounding monikers.

And it looks like the future might need all the help it can get as, not only has mankind peaked as I’ve already demonstrated, but the teenies (that’s what I’m calling this decade till I can think of something better) have already got underway with the dis-spiriting news that we’ve already started hurtling down the other side of the evolutionary mountain.  Because we’ve started getting uglier.

Yes, that’s right- our old friends at BeautifulPeople.com have been at it again, this time turfing over 5,000 people off their dating website for the aesthetically pleasant and socially retarded as they have slipped below the appropriate standard of loveliness.  The folks who have managed to get through the stringent selection process and get on the website have been doing a spot of internal policing and have complained about anyone who has posted a photo of themselves that suggests they’ve gained any weight over Christmas.

Now I don’t want to pour scorn on anyone so early in a new decade but isn’t this moving slightly from an endearingly self-absorbed form of sociopathy into full blown nutterdom?  I can’t decide if BeautifulPeople.com is now on the path to becoming either a new and terrifying cult or a breeding ground for worldwide network of slightly more attractive versions of the killer from ‘Se7en’.

Judge for yourselves by reading this quote by BeautifulPeople.com’s founder Robert Hintze from possibly the most chilling press release ever unleashed: “we mourn the loss of any member, but the fact remains that our members demand the high standard of beauty be upheld; letting fatties roam the site is a direct threat to our business model”.

Tough call isn’t it?  That talk of how they ‘mourn the loss of any member’ is exactly the sort of thing you’d expect to hear some demented cult leader utter to comfort his followers after a few of their number had been at the mass suicide punchbowl a few days before ‘The Ascension’; while the use of the word ‘fatties’ does hint at the sort of simmering anger and resentment that fuelled Kevin Spacey to get Gwyneth Paltrow’s head Fed-Exed to the middle of nowhere.

So- BeautifulPeople.com; sinister cult or club for serial killers?  Robert Hintze; the new David Koresh or the new Dennis Nielsen?  Whatever it turns out to be- it’s definitely an incredibly successful website and Robert Hintze is clearly a gifted entrepreneur and the sort of man who knows how to be a success and get some publicity in 2010.

Maybe that’s what we could call this new decade then.   Not the ‘teenies’ but ‘the we-all-just-realised-that-to-be-successful-in-this-day-an-age-you’ve-got-to-be-a-cross-between-a-manipulative-control-freak-and-a-murderous-psychopath-ies’. 

Here’s to the future.  Happy New Year to you all.

Charity begins online

Hopefully I recently pumped a little entertainment into all your faces by detailling a harrowing night sat in front of Children in Need which, 5 minutes of jiggling newsreaders aside, basically amounted to nearly a third of day’s worth of light entertainment attrocities scorching themselves on my retinas- a bit like the aversion therapy Alex undergoes in Clockwork Orange only with more John Barrowman.
Well, not content with that particular evening, charities all over the place have been going out of their ways to grind all the goodness and humanity out of my core and replace them with a yawning, gaping wound that wouldn’t look out of place in the first 20 minutes of Saving Private Ryan.
First of all, those new fangled charity collectors seem to be back in even greater numbers to clog up the streets of town and city centres and try to corner unsuspecting people into giving them their bank details for a £5 a month donation of which the collectors themselves probably take a good £4.50 home with them to spend on ridiculous haircuts (the male ones) or stupid facial jewellry (the female ones).
They’ve also got smarter too and started working in packs of three or more to shuttle oblivious members of the public down blind alleys until they have no choice but to make eye contact and engage these people in conversation.  At which point they’re hoping traditional British sensibilities kick in and instead of being nasty to someone’s face the luckless prole will then stump up the number off their debit card and more tattoos (the male ones) and hair dye (the female ones) can be bought on the commission.  They’re like velociraptors in bibs.
At least we can say that in some respects charities are getting more cunning in some respects with their attempts at raising money because, in another way, they’ve got fantastically fucking dumb.
This weekend, if anyone plays recent X-Box 360 shoot-fest sensation ‘Call of Duty- Modern Warfare 2′on X-Box Live (which is essentially Facebook for sociopaths) then the imaginatively monikered game shop ‘Game’ will make a donation to the charity Warchild which- clue in the title- aims to help children who’s lives have been shattered by the grim realities of armed conflict in countries where it’s a harrowing daily reality and not an excuse to fire up an X-Station Zebra and get some ‘frags’ or something.
Let’s explore this in a little more detail making reference to evidence from which to deduce reasoned conclusions.  A bit like a dissertation except with the word ‘fannies’ in the 7th paragraph.  The money from this ‘Game for Good’ event is being raised for ‘Warchild’ who describe their noble mission as ‘to support and strengthen the protective environment for children who, as a result of conflict, live with a combination of insecurity, poverty and exclusion’.  The money is being raised by Game encouraging people to ‘strap on the frags, pull on the kevlar and lock and load the M4′
For those of you to whom this isn’t clear- what is basically taking place this weekend is the equivalent of raising money for the Princess Diana Memorial Fund by having a virtual rally through Parisian underpasses.  I don’t want to pour scorn on what is obviously an attempt to raise much-needed money for a very worthy cause but wouldn’t it be more fitting to do it by encouraging people not to run around cyberspace pretending to shoot their friend to death?  Maybe donations can be accumulated by having gamers enter death match arenas and then just wandering around chatting to each other and handing each other small gifts like a Kinder Egg or something.  Or change half the players into war orphans and half into desperate infertile parents and having them search for each other till everyone’s paired up and living happily ever after.  The best players on the planet could even get some power-ups and play as Madonna.
I honestly didn’t mean this to turn into a cri de coeur against the idea of donating to charities but it’s obviously how I feel right now.  A student was recently telling me how they’re i-Pod was a special ‘anti AIDS’ edition for which £50 of the purchase price was given to Aids charities.  And guess how much more than the usual retail price for an i-Pod it cost.
Right.
It’s much like ‘Fairtrade’ products in shops which aim to demonstrate how the company supplying it is being caring, sharing and humanitarian by offering more money to the original farmers and producers when in fact, all they do, is shunt up the retail price and get us to pay it instead.  We can feel good about ourselves, the little people get more money and the company gets all the credit despite just labelling some of their produce ‘Fairtrade’ and instantly implying that everything else that they do is based on exploiting the people at the start of the supply chain and then flogging it to us as cheaply as possible.  They’ll be nice once in a while to the farmers, but only if we’re the ones willing to pay for it.
Just as we’re the ones being cornered on the high street by idiots in tabards because we can’t be trusted to be nice without being tricked into it.  Just as we’re the ones who will happily give money to Warchild provided we can do it by pretending to wage war against our best friends.  Just as we’re the ones who can only make a concerted effort to raise money for children who need it if we’re promised a night of Eastenders musical specials and John bloody Barrowman.
God this planet’s fucked.

Hopefully I recently pumped a little entertainment into all your faces by detailling a harrowing night sat in front of Children in Need which, 5 minutes of jiggling newsreaders aside, basically amounted to nearly a third of day’s worth of light entertainment attrocities scorching themselves on my retinas- a bit like the aversion therapy Alex undergoes in Clockwork Orange only with more John Barrowman.

Well, not content with that particular evening, charities all over the place have been going out of their ways to grind all the goodness and humanity out of my core and replace them with a yawning, gaping wound that wouldn’t look out of place in the first 20 minutes of Saving Private Ryan.

First of all, those new fangled charity collectors seem to be back in even greater numbers to clog up the streets of town and city centres and try to corner unsuspecting people into giving them their bank details for a £5 a month donation of which the collectors themselves probably take a good £4.50 home with them to spend on ridiculous haircuts (the male ones) or stupid facial jewellry (the female ones).

They’ve also got smarter too and started working in packs of three or more to shuttle oblivious members of the public down blind alleys until they have no choice but to make eye contact and engage these people in conversation.  At which point they’re hoping traditional British sensibilities kick in and instead of being nasty to someone’s face the luckless prole will then stump up the number off their debit card and more tattoos (the male ones) and hair dye (the female ones) can be bought on the commission.  They’re like velociraptors in bibs.

At least we can say that in some respects charities are getting more cunning with their attempts at raising money because, in another way, they’ve got fantastically fucking dumb.

This weekend, if anyone plays recent X-Box 360 shoot-fest sensation ‘Call of Duty- Modern Warfare 2′on X-Box Live (which is essentially Facebook for sociopaths) then the imaginatively monikered game shop ‘Game’ will make a donation to the charity Warchild which- clue in the title- aims to help children who’s lives have been shattered by the grim realities of armed conflict in countries where it’s a harrowing daily reality and not an excuse to fire up an X-Station Zebra and get some ‘frags’ or something.

Let’s explore this in a little more detail making reference to evidence from which to deduce reasoned conclusions.  A bit like a dissertation except with the word ‘fannies’ in the 7th paragraph.  The money from this ‘Game for Good’ event is being raised for ‘Warchild’ who describe their noble mission as ‘to support and strengthen the protective environment for children who, as a result of conflict, live with a combination of insecurity, poverty and exclusion’.  The money is being raised by Game encouraging people to ‘strap on the frags, pull on the kevlar and lock and load the M4′.

For those of you to whom this isn’t clear- what is basically taking place this weekend is the equivalent of raising money for the Princess Diana Memorial Fund by having a virtual rally through Parisian underpasses.  I don’t want to pour scorn on what is obviously an attempt to raise much-needed money for a very worthy cause but wouldn’t it be more fitting to do it by encouraging people not to run around cyberspace pretending to shoot their friend to death?  Maybe donations can be accumulated by having gamers enter death match arenas and then just wandering around chatting to each other and handing each other small gifts like a Kinder Egg or something.  Or change half the players into war orphans and half into desperate infertile parents and having them search for each other till everyone’s paired up and living happily ever after.  The best players on the planet could even get some power-ups and play as Madonna.

I honestly didn’t mean this to turn into a cri de coeur against the idea of donating to charities but it’s obviously how I feel right now.  A student was recently telling me how they’re i-Pod was a special ‘anti AIDS’ edition for which £50 of the purchase price was given to Aids charities.  And guess how much more than the usual retail price for an i-Pod it cost.

Right.

It’s much like ‘Fairtrade’ products in shops which aim to demonstrate how the company supplying it is being caring, sharing and humanitarian by offering more money to the original farmers and producers when in fact, all they do, is shunt up the retail price and get us to pay it instead.  We can feel good about ourselves, the little people get more money and the company gets all the credit despite just labelling some of their produce ‘Fairtrade’ and instantly implying that everything else that they do is based on exploiting the people at the start of the supply chain and then flogging it to us as cheaply as possible.  They’ll be nice once in a while to the farmers, but only if we’re the ones willing to pay for it.

Just as we’re the ones being cornered on the high street by idiots in tabards because we can’t be trusted to be nice without being tricked into it.  Just as we’re the ones who will happily give money to Warchild provided we can do it by pretending to wage war against our best friends.  Just as we’re the ones who can only make a concerted effort to raise money for children who need it if we’re promised a night of Eastenders musical specials and John bloody Barrowman.

God this planet’s fucked.

The Beautiful People, The Beautiful People…

Gratulationerna för varelse mycket söt än jag och all min bog trotting Engelsk vännerna. That’s Swedish for ‘Congratulations for being much prettier than me and all my bog trotting British friends’, though I suspect the translator I used didn’t understand ‘bog trotting’ and kept it in English rather than bothering to find a Swedish interpretation. If I put the two words in by themselves the apparent translation is ‘bow pavement’ which I think means that my web browser is having a nervous breakdown. Or the original programmer of the site was too busy being gorgeous to put in the requisite information to discover the Swedish translation for ‘bog trotter’. Though he did program in ‘swamp donkey’ (‘svimmat åsna’).
The chances are there is no direct Swedish translation of ‘bog trotter’ because, and this is official, the Swedish are the most beautiful race on Earth. For men that is. The hottest women, on the other hand, are from Norway. Though it seems pretty much everyone in that part of the world is a drop-dead eye-festival of prettiness. No wonder all Scandinavians are smug.
Meanwhile, the Brits, like me, are among the ugliest folk on the face of the Earth. If Earth actually does have a face, we’re the exzema.
This Earth-shattering research comes from a website called Beautifulpeople.com which I’m going to tell you about, but not before you’ve taken some deep breaths and thought some happy thoughts. You’re going to need them. And make sure there’s nothing sharp, breakable or precious in arm’s reach. Ready? Good.
Beautifulpeople.com is a dating site that asks “Do looks matter to you, when it comes to selecting a partner?”, wonders aloud if “you want to guarantee your dates will always be beautiful?” and promises to offer you “No more filtering through unattractive people on mainstream sites”. It only lets you onboard if other people on the site decide you’re good looking enough to get in by rating you as being in one of four categories- ‘Yes definitely’, ‘Hmmm yes, OK’, ‘Hmmm no, not really’ and ‘NO definitely NOT’. It guarantees that the ugly, the average and the plain won’t even get a look in to spoil your culpted magnificence as it searches for a love as knee-tremblingly adonis-like as your own. It guarantees that personality, soul, warmth, humour, sweetness and humanity are sucked clean out of the messy business of finding love.
It’s the Black American Express Cards of last-ditch cyber-seducation. Essentially, it’s matchmaking for people who find speed dating too in-depth. It’s a plotline rejected from Sex and the City for being both ludicrous and awful made tragically real. It feels chillingly like one of the seven signs of the Apocalypse.
Beautifulpeople.com was set up in Denmark (I told you all Scandinavians were smug) and went global last month. Since then about 2 million people have applied and only one-in-every-six applicants have got through. They’re the beautiful ones. Well done. Good for them.
I’m determined not to hate the website for three reasons:
1) Hatred is clearly what they want. It couldn’t be a more naked attempt at stirring up some attention-grabbing controversy from newspapers if it was a musical about paedolphilia called ‘Massive Sweaty Cocks’.
2) It might be a self-aggrandising cult for beautiful people but at least they aren’t as bad as ugly people. Beautiful people are often intolerable but at least they don’t make the world a worse place to look at just by exisiting.
3) It’s really, really hard not to feel sorry for the beautiful people who not only sign up to the website but get through the selection process. Think about it- most people in the world are OK looking. They’re fine. Pretty good. And the chances are, owing to the vaguries and varieties of human taste, there’s always likely to be at least a few people in the world who find someone attractive. It’s a matter of odds. This means that, chances are, if you want to find someone you fancy to have a relationship with you can and you will. If you’re beautiful, all it means is that you’ll have a few more people to pick from. You’ll still have to have a personality, be engaging and form a loving bond with someone but at least if God gave you a nice face and great figure you get there’s more chance you’re partner will be that millionaire, romantic/nymphomaniac, artistic/fun-loving, yoga/ski instructor with the classical dancer’s body/great tits you always wanted. Unless, that is, you’ve somehow ended up in the murky world of online dating and “filtering through unattractive people on mainstream sites” before finally seeing the light and being accepted into the hallowed pantheon on beautifulpeople.com.
The maths here are pretty simple. People want to have realtionships with someone they find attractive. Therefore: beautiful people are more attractive and will therefore have more potential suitors to choose from. Therefore: any beautiful person who cannot find a relationship by conventional means and has to resort to their own online cross between a dating website and advanced eugenics is clearly a gold-standard mental whose aesthetic charms are clearly not enough to keep a partner round long enough in the face of some atomic-powered personality defects.
And that’s why I feel sorry for them all on beautifulpeople.com. Not only do they have to trudge through life peering with horror through their (still gorgeous) squinted eyes at the rest of us normal people, but they then have to resort to finding love on a website that, basic logic tells us, should really be called hot-nutters.com. They’ll end up in relationships with fellow gorgeous lunatics which will inevitably lead in many cases to either petty, vindictive squabbling (if you’re lucky) or horrible, bloody axe murders (if you’re not).
So, by all means get join this site if you want to and have the chance meet a Scandinavian who is as stunning as you. Apparently they’re all lovely over there (a frankly staggering 76% of Norwegian women who apply to beatuifulpeople.com get in) but just don’t expect them to be too together on the sanity front. The whole region’s teeming with gorgeous looney-tunes.
No wonder Scandinavians are all smug. No wonder Scandinavians all commit suicide.

Gratulationerna för varelse mycket söt än jag och all min bog trotting Engelsk vännerna. That’s Swedish for ‘Congratulations for being much prettier than me and all my bog trotting British friends’, though I suspect the translator I used didn’t understand ‘bog trotting’ and kept it in English rather than bothering to find a Swedish interpretation. If I put the two words in by themselves the apparent translation is ‘bow pavement’ which I think means that my web browser is having a nervous breakdown. Or the original programmer of the site was too busy being gorgeous to put in the requisite information to discover the Swedish translation for ‘bog trotter’. Though he did program in ‘swamp donkey’ (‘svimmat åsna’).

The chances are there is no direct Swedish translation of ‘bog trotter’ because, and this is official, the Swedish are the most beautiful race on Earth. For men that is. The hottest women, on the other hand, are from Norway. Though it seems pretty much everyone in that part of the world is a drop-dead eye-festival of prettiness. No wonder all Scandinavians are smug.

Meanwhile, the Brits, like me, are among the ugliest folk on the face of the Earth. If Earth actually does have a face, we’re the exzema.

This paradigm-shattering research comes from a website called Beautifulpeople.com which I’m going to tell you about, but not before you’ve taken some deep breaths and thought some happy thoughts. You’re going to need them. And make sure there’s nothing sharp, breakable or precious in arm’s reach. Ready? Good.

Beautifulpeople.com is a dating site that asks “Do looks matter to you, when it comes to selecting a partner?”, wonders aloud if “you want to guarantee your dates will always be beautiful?” and promises to offer you “No more filtering through unattractive people on mainstream sites”. It only lets you onboard if other people on the site decide you’re good looking enough to get in by rating you as being in one of four categories- ‘Yes definitely’, ‘Hmmm yes, OK’, ‘Hmmm no, not really’ and ‘NO definitely NOT’. It guarantees that the ugly, the average and the plain won’t even get a look in to spoil your sculpted magnificence as it searches for a love as knee-tremblingly adonis-like as your own. It guarantees that personality, soul, warmth, humour, sweetness and humanity are sucked clean out of the messy business of finding love.

It’s the Black American Express card of last-ditch cyber-seduction. Essentially, it’s matchmaking for people who find speed dating too in-depth. It’s a plotline rejected from Sex and the City for being both ludicrous and awful made tragically real. It feels chillingly like one of the seven signs of the Apocalypse.

Beautifulpeople.com was set up in Denmark (I told you all Scandinavians were smug) and went global last month. Since then about 2 million people have applied and only one-in-every-six applicants have got through. They’re the beautiful ones. Well done. Good for them.

I’m determined not to hate the website for three reasons:

1) Hatred is clearly what they want. It couldn’t be a more naked attempt at stirring up some attention-grabbing controversy from newspapers if it was a musical about paedolphilia called ‘Massive Sweaty Cocks’.

2) It might be a self-aggrandising cult for beautiful people but at least they aren’t as bad as ugly people. Beautiful people are often intolerable but at least they don’t make the world a worse place to look at just by exisiting.

3) It’s really, really hard not to feel sorry for the beautiful people who not only sign up to the website but get through the selection process. Think about it- most people in the world are OK looking. They’re fine. Pretty good. And the chances are, owing to the vaguries and varieties of human taste, there’s always likely to be at least a few people in the world who find someone attractive. It’s a matter of odds. This means that, chances are, if you want to find someone you fancy to have a relationship with you can and you will. If you’re beautiful, all it means is that you’ll have a few more people to pick from. You’ll still have to have a personality, be engaging and form a loving bond with someone but at least if God gave you a nice face and great figure there’s more chance you’re partner will be that multi-millionaire, romantic/nymphomaniac, artistic/fun-loving, yoga/ski instructor with the classical dancer’s body/great tits you always wanted. Unless, that is, you’ve somehow ended up in the murky world of online dating and “filtering through unattractive people on mainstream sites” before finally seeing the light and being accepted into the hallowed pantheon on beautifulpeople.com.

The maths here are pretty simple. People want to have realtionships with someone they find attractive. Therefore: beautiful people are more attractive and will therefore have more potential suitors to choose from. Therefore: any beautiful person who cannot find a relationship by conventional means and has to resort to their own online cross between a dating website and advanced eugenics is clearly a gold-standard mental whose aesthetic charms are clearly not enough to keep a partner round long enough in the face of some atomic-powered personality defects.

And that’s why I feel sorry for them all on beautifulpeople.com. Not only do they have to trudge through life peering with horror through their (still gorgeous) squinted eyes at the rest of us normal people, but they then have to resort to finding love on a website that, basic logic tells us, should really be called hot-nutters.com. They’ll end up in relationships with fellow gorgeous lunatics which will inevitably lead in many cases to either petty, vindictive squabbling (if you’re lucky) or horrible, bloody axe murders (if you’re not).

So, by all means get join this site if you want to and, who knows, maybe you’ll have the chance to meet a Scandinavian who is as stunning as you. Apparently they’re all lovely over there (a frankly staggering 76% of Norwegian women who apply to beatuifulpeople.com get in) but just don’t expect them to be too together on the sanity front. The whole region’s teeming with gorgeous looney-tunes.

No wonder Scandinavians are all smug. No wonder Scandinavians all commit suicide.

This Is It

Let me tell you about the man who boiled himself to death in a pair of waders. Essentially, he was a chap who got his rocks off by filling a massive pair of waders with water and then standing in them with his nipples wired up to the mains. This in turn, and don’t ask me how he figured all this out, allowed him to use a dimmer switch to electorcute himself in a way he found arousing. Or at least it did until the day he suffered a minor seizure during one shock and was unable to move his arm and flick the switch off which in turn lead to him slowly simmering his way to oblivion over the next hour or so. A bit like a broth. But with a hard-on.

Pretty humiliating eh? And that’s still nowhere near how undignified the death of Michael Jackson’s been; with still no sign of the poor dead man’s torment abating. As if it wasn’t bad enough having helicopters hovering over his final ambulance ride, as if it wasn’t bad enough having reports of his death inter-sperced with clips from the Thriller video where he dances around as a corpse, as if it wasn’t bad enough having details of his mammoth prescription drugs shopping list plastered all over the papers, as if it wasn’t bad enough having that jaw-dropping memorial service beamed around the world- especially when Usher looked like he was going to hysterically rip the coffin lid open, desperately grab Jackson’s body by the lapels and try to sing him back to life- as if all that wasn’t bad enough we reach the coup de grace this week with the release of a video documenting his final weeks called ‘This Is It’.

This seems to have been lost on everyone- after all ‘This Is It’ was the title of the comeback show he was rehearsing for- but what sort of name is that for a film of a man’s final acts upon this Earth? A film which everyone will be watching in the hope of seeing the Grim Reaper hiding behind the drum riser ready to pounce. ‘This Is It’. ‘This Is It’. Honestly. ‘This Is It’. For a sense of perspective, here’s a few titles for a film of Michael Jackson hurtling towards his end which would have been in no way in worse taste than ‘This Is It’:

‘Dead Man Dancing’. ‘Prescription For Death’. ‘Doomwalker’. ‘Blame It On The Druggie’. ‘Lets All Watch A Man Uniwttingly Rehearsing Himself Into The Grave’. ‘Beat It’.

It’ll probably make a fortune for everyone involved (apart from the star, obviously) including the director Kenny Ortega, a man who is also responsible for High School Musical and therefore already on course for being one of the most sinister men on the planet even without his part in ‘Wacko Jacko’s Terminal Journal’ (another potential title). Obviously, what ‘This Is It’ serves to do is allow Jackson’s fans to see a little more of him, especially as there’ll be no more new performances to savour in the future. After all, we can’t turn back time.

Except, of course, we can. In fact, we did it just this last Sunday when we all turned the clocks back an hour and gave ourselves a luxurious extra hour in bed. Or at least, that was the plan. What actually happens when the clocks go back is:

1. Everyone tries to decide whether to turn the clocks back before bed- which’ll mean waking up at about 7am which is an ungodly hour for anyone to be conscious on a Sunday; or turn them back in the morning which’ll mean forgetting to turn them back in the morning and being an hour behind everything till at least mid-afternoon, like a time-traveller who’s fallen 60 minutes out of sync with the rest of existence and is therefore excluded from everything as he or she slowly loses their grip on sanity and finally flips out when they realise they’ve missed the first hour of the ‘Come Dine With Me’ omnibus in which the hilariously stuck-up estate agent has burnt her souffles and spilled a bloody mary on Ryan the overly critical baggage handler from Dewsbury.

2. People who use their phones as their alarm clocks all forget whether their phones automatically adjust when the clocks go back and can’t decide if they should go ahead and alter it or not. They all decide not to then wake up in the morning, check to see what time their phone is showing, realise that they don’t know if the time it is showing has actually been corrected or not, struggle with unending futility to find another clock in the house but realise they now use their new 3000 gigabyte, 27 terra-pixel handset/MP3 player/whisk to do ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING IN THEIR LIVES. They then switch on the Andrew Marr show to find out what the time is, are faced with the creeping dread of discovering they don’t actually know what time the Andrew Marr Show starts and finishes and therefore give up and go back to bed, their planned luxurious lie-in now lying tattered, sweaty and ruined beneath the duvet.

3. No-one really benefits at all on Sunday, then they go to their jobs on Monday and suddenly realise they won’t be leaving work during daylight for the next 6 months and seriously consider flinging themselves under the nearest TransPennine Express.

4. Something important happens with farmers but no-one is sure what it is.

Bearing all this in mind, it’s little surprise that there’s been a rumbling in recent days of discontent with the whole idea of pushing and pulling the hour hand backwards and forwards twice a year. After all, Daylight Saving Time was originally brought in to help agriculture during the First World War and since farmers these days are restricted to simply growing cows with which to trample hikers to death there isn’t much point to it anymore. People who think this are missing the point by a mile.

If we can all decide twice a year to bend time to our will so that it’s suddenly an hour earlier or later than the clocks say it is then why can’t we expand this to suit our every whim? After all, the wonders of Sky+ now mean that TV schedules are basically meaningless beside the striding magnificence of our personal timelines so let’s just extend that to life itself.

Don’t want to get up for work in the morning? Fair enough- it’s now 3 hours earlier. Don’t want to turn 30 next year? Not a problem, lets just say you’re 18 again. Don’t Like Mondays? No problem, it’s Tuesday already. You’re favourite musician’s dead? No sweat, just go to the pictures and we can all pretend he’s still alive.

Actually, we’ve already sorted that last one.

Pop-a-Doodle-Do

We human beings are constantly crowing about what seperates us from the animals which, to be fair, really seems like we’re rubbing it in to the rest of the Earth’s creatures. I mean, we say all this and they can’t answer back can they? Because they can’t speak and we can- it’s what seperates us from the animals.

And there’s plenty more where that came from. Powers of reasoning, senses of humour, wheelbarrows- all things that we have and animals don’t and it would be very simple for us to become divided- to create a bit of a ‘them and us’ attitude between humans and animals which would be a crying shame as there is something far greater, far more important and far, far more special that unites us with a good portion of the Mother Nature’s other living, breathing creations. It’s something that we humans may feel, as we rightfully should, to be one of our greatest innovations of the 20th century but it is in fact something that we pinched from the animal kingdom without even realising it.

Pop music.

Now obviously a sparrow didn’t write ‘Are Friends Electric?’ and it wasn’t a sperm whale playing the organ on ‘Like A Rolling Stone’ but animals have been making great pop since time began. That’s “since time began” if you’re a Creationist. If you believe in Darwinism rather than Creationism (known colloquially as ‘not being a Grade-A fuckclump’) then you believe animals reached a certain stage in their evolution and then realised what they could do when they opened their mouths and made sound come out. And that, my friends, was a good day.

Anyway, a load of the Earth’s creatures use song for a variety of reasons. To mark their territory, to warn of danger, to identify themselves within a peer group and, most importantly, to attract a mate. And that’s exactly what great pop music should do as well. For each of those criteria I’ve listed just think of ‘Anarchy in the UK’, ‘What’s Goin’ On?’, ‘My Generation’ and, for the last one, absolutely every good song ever written by anyone ever.

All good pop music, when boiled down to the bones, is about getting laid or at least created with that intention in mind. Think about it- being a musician instantly makes someone about a billion times more attractive than they otherwise would be. I’ve been staggered for years now by the number of girls I’ve met who fancy Noel Gallagher despite the fact he looks like Parker from Thunderbirds. Although when I think about it he did write ‘Acquiesce’ so I’d probably bang him silly myself. Then there’s Morrissey whose very notion of sexuality has been the focus of intense scrutiny for years, especially since he’s been extremely coy about it throughout. His lyrics, however, constantly address the subject to the point that his last album had more sex all over it than the average bongo flick and- despite his occasional clalims of celebacy- his cross gender appeal, not to mention his extraordinary popularity within California’s latin community, means he’s probably the person on the planet that most people want to sleep with. And yet, if he wasn’t a pop star, he’d be the wierd bloke that lived on your street when you were growing up- you know, the one who lived in a bungalow behind permanently-closed brown curtains and had a limp. He’d be him. And then he really would be celebate.

I ought to point out at this juncture exactly what I mean by ‘pop music’. I mean it in it’s original sense- where the ‘pop’ means ‘popular’ and that means practically anything which, until downloads made things go a bit funny, could be aimed at the charts- either single or album. Basically, anything that fits into a lineage that began when Robert Johnson went to the crossroads and the Bobbysoxers started screaming at Sinatra- which is intriguingly also the time that sex and music really got to know each other. So- The Beatles? Pop. ABBA? Pop. Metallica? Pop. N.W.A.? Pop. Fairport Convention? Pop. Black Lace? Pop. Paranoid Android? Pop. Ernie, The Fastest Milkman In The West? Pop.

In recent years the word ‘pop’ has come to be associated primarily with the likes of Britney, Westlife and everything churned out by Simon Cowell’s TV marionette parades and while they’re all part of the picture they’re only a small part. Pop has always been tribal and this manufactured stuff has always been one of the tribes- in fact it’s pretty much the oldest one of them all. Remember that the next time you think the high-waisted one is single-handedly ruining music with a succession of talent shows that essentially make him a one man play-dough bastard factory.

I do wonder though how far the comparison between human pop and animal music can be taken. For instance, does birdsong have the variety in quality that pop has? Does a thrush let fly with it’s call on a morning only to be greeted by the shuffling indifference of blue tits saying “Nah, that’s rubbish”. Is there a blue whale in the southern oceans churning out a succession of Burt Bacharach-esque whale-song gems while a bunch of bitter whale hacks can produce nothing more than bland, derivative nonsense? I ask this because what actually makes great pop, and how anyone goes about the simple act of writing a classic song, remains one of life’s great intangibles. Paul Morley has a theory on what makes great pop music, though it is slighted by the fact that he’s a deluded muppet. He is one of those music writers who believes he’s part of the story rather than a mere observer. We could call this ‘Paolo Hewitt Syndrome’ and Morley is a terminal case. Just read his stuff on Joy Division- he think’s he’s part of the band. Seriously. The man’s insane. Hunter S. Thompson has a lot to answer for. Or at least he would if he wasn’t dead- though if there’s an afterworld he’s probably writing a book at the moment about death as if he’s the first person to ever have it happen to him. Like the drug-addled fool he is/was. Students will probably love it. Students and idiots.

Getting back to the point, Morley reckons that all great pop music could be imagined as being sung by Elvis which is, of course, complete and utter arse-gravy. I’m as big a Presleyterian as you’ll find but even I have to admit that his version of ‘Cum On Feel The Noize’ would be dreadful. Ditto his attempt at ‘Bittersweet Symphony’. Though hearing him have a pop at ‘(You Make Me Feel Like A) Natural Woman’ would be worth a giggle. The simple fact is that no-one seems to have actually figured out what great pop music is and how to make it- just think of the hit-rates of even the greatest bands. ‘The Beatles’ were capable of both staggering brilliance and bemusing awfulness, often on the same album, as have been everyone from The Kinks to Oasis to Prince. To my mind there’s only The Smiths and Simon and Garfunkel who came close to hitting the bullseye with practically every song and both of those acts couldn’t keep it up for more than three or four years before it all got too much.

Maybe it’s impossible to come up with a formula because great music, like anything great in life, is all about moments. In pop music, it’s the little things- a hook, a word, a guitar lick, a sample- that make the magic. God really is in the details. Think of the moment the flute comes into ‘There Is A Light That Never Goes Out’. The backing vocal that comes out of nowhere in the second chorus of ‘Careless Whisper’. The pregnant pauses in both ‘Your The First, The Last, My Everything’ and ‘Everybody Hurts’. The heartstopping mini drum solo in ‘Don’t Look Back In Anger’. The bit with the handclaps in ‘Teenage Kicks’ which really ought to be naff but is actually brilliant. No-one could have just sat down and written these moments- planning them out in meticulous detail. They’re the sort of moments that can make a man believe in divine intervention or at least strange things happening when the planets align. Inspiration, the really good stuff, just comes from nowhere and can be gone before you realise you ever had it there.

And that’s probably why great music will always seem a little bit other-worldly, a little bit uncanny, a little bit intangible. Because, like the inspiration that begets it, it seems to come from someplace else- beyond simple planning and rational thought. You can try and keep plugging away, searching for the moment that lifts everything into the realm of the special but if the inspiration isn’t there you’ll only end up with that most disappointing of phenomena- bland pop music.

Or, even worse, the bollocks you’ve just read. Sorry about that.

To The Moon And Back For Valentine’s Day

Are you aware that you can be extradited to the United States of America for possession of moondust? It all stems from the fact that the U.S. Government declared any of this particular substance was illegal for the public to the own and, since the Yanks are the only ones to have ever visited Earth’s near neighbour, anyone possessing any is committing a crime against the American nation no matter whereabouts on the planet they do it. Or, for that matter, if they grab hold of any on the Moon itself. An intriguing subtext to all this is that if the Chinese go to the Moon in the near future they’ll technically be declaring war on the States.

Whilst I’m on the subject- it’s worth pointing out that Moon rock is easily the most hallucinatory substance in existence- you don’t even need to ingest any of it to have your head well and truly bent out of shape. A fragment of moon rock weighing just 0.2g was once sold for $442,500 and- in a breathtaking example of genuine psychedelic mania- a stolen-and-recovered piece of lunar debris which had originally been a gift to the people of Honduras was the subject of a civil court case in 2003 which was entitled, and I’m not making this up, “United States of America Vs One Moon Rock and One Ten Inch by Fourteen Inch Plaque”. If you’re interested, the United States won.

There’s actually very little about America’s relationship with the Moon that isn’t deeply surreal. Any visitors to Buzz Aldrin’s home will apparently be treated to a viewing of a framed NASA travel voucher that covered his expenses in mid-July 1969. It reads “Payee’s Name: Col. Edwin E. Aldrin 00018; From: Houston, Texas; To: Cape Kennedy, Florida -to- Moon -to- Pacific Ocean; Amount Claimed $33.31″ There are those who say the Moon landings were faked- but there’s absolutely no way anyone could have made that up.

Perhaps it should come as no surprise that a country like America would claim travelling expenses to a place in history or make an attempt to sue a geological feature from another planet. They are, as we shall see on Saturday, the nation that turned an ancient, endearingly bonkers and staunchly parochial festival of romantic devotion into a soulfree, desolate and- worst of all- blandly universal trudge through the twin cackpools of cliche and duty.

It would seem obvious that Valentine’s Day is a depressing event for those bereft of romantic entanglement but it’s infinitely worse if you actually have someone who, so tradition dictates, should be celebrated on the day. Nowadays, these festivities are limited to just a couple of options- either trot out for an over-priced three course meal and bottle of fizzy pink wine in a restaurant which has simply clogged itself with heart-shaped balloons for the occasion; or have a night-in which will inevitably feature the man of the couple yelling at a still-born attempt at a Gordon Ramsey recipe and the woman accepting that no claims of a headache are going to get her out of doing some sex that night.

Modern Valentine’s Day stems from an American, Esther Howland, noting the quaint British tradition of sending notes to loved ones on the 14th of February and deciding to mass-produce them and make a fortune, which she duly did. Nothing wrong with that, I suppose, but of all the Valentine’s Day traditions that she could have picked from anywhere in the world to exploit she really did plump for the dullest of the bunch.

Imagine if, instead, she’d have been the spear-head behind a rebirth of the ancient Roman festival of Lupercalia- which was celebrated around February 14th in honour of the She-Wolf who suckled Romulus and Remus. During this festival, various men of the city would sacrifice two goats and a dog, make whips from their flesh and then, during a massive feast, charge naked up and down the city streets striking the women of the city- who queued up willingly- with their animal-skin weapons in order to boost their fertility. All that survives in the modern world from this, the original Valentine’s Day celebration, is the date of the occasion and everyone going out for a meal.

If the idea of reviving Lupercalia this Saturday seems a little off-putting to the ladies, who- if we’re honest- do seem these days to be less inclined to getting whipped with the skin of a goat by nude men in a town centre, then how’s about we go back to an idea established in Paris on Valentine’s Day 1400 and let the fairer sex set-up the ‘High Court of Love’. This particular phenomenon, possibly the most French thing to have ever occurred in history, saw the women of the city set up a fully functioning court to deal with betrayals against members of their gender by men who were then punished accordingly. Intriguingly, the women who ran these courts appointed men as the judges based on examples of their writing and a poetry recital- thereby combining the holy triptych of chav-friendly television; ‘Judge Judy’, ‘The Jeremy Kyle Show’ and ‘The X Factor’ in one neat package centuries before ITV was even though of.

So, I implore you, this year- instead of the jaded, listless modern Valentine’s which was dreamed up all those years ago just to make Esther Howland rich, let’s get back to the old school and do it properly. Men- get naked, get some goats and get whipping. Women- take your goat-whipping with glee then adjourn a court to sort out any man who’s ever screwed you over with the full force of your own law’s sweet fury. Let’s make February 14th a day to celebrate again- a joy, not an obligation. Oh, and by the way, if any ladies out there do decide to bring back these love courts and you need a judge, consider this my application.

Though bear in mind that if someone’s given you moondust for Valentine’s Day, I’m going to have to extradite you.

High Five

You may not have heard of Eugene O’Neill but you’ll probably know his most famous quote- “There is no present or future, only the past, happening over and over again”. It seems I’ve reached the age where I can appreciate that statement in the context of my own life- as well as the probable reason why the guy who wrote it spent much of his life in an alcoholic stupor. For example, I went to the cinema for the first time in ages this past weekend to see ‘Frost/Nixon’ and it occurred to me that I only seem to intensively trot to the kino these days in the first few months of the year- when the cinemas are stuffed with moral-heavy, well-acted award snafflers which no mouthy teen-spawn go to see and then talk through and when there’s no chance of inadvertantly seeing anything directed by Tony Scott. In the next few days and weeks I’m looking forward to seeing ‘The Curious Case of Benjamin Button’ (SPOILER ALERT: Brad Pitt is born as an elderly man with a face made entirely out of special effects, ages backwards, learns valuable life lessons, loses Oscar to the bloke out of ’9 1/2 Weeks’) and ‘The Damned United’ (since I’ve not seen a film featuring Michael Sheen as a famous British figure since, well last weekend actually) among others before I head to the I-MAX to see ‘Watchmen’ and begin my self-imposed exile till 2010 and another blissful few weeks of twat-free cinema audiences.

It seems logical to assume that mankind will never be able to muck about with O’Neill’s succinct little phrase by cracking the ability to travel through time. If we were to manage it at any point in the dim and distant future surely some intrepid explorer from then would have arrived in the present by now to let us know that we’ll get there in the end and to keep on trying. They’d probably have seen the credit crunch coming too and warned us about that as well. And it would have been nice of them to also let us know just how bad the third series of Skins would turn out to be. This is all assuming, of course, that they aren’t all familiar with the Back to the Future trilogy- especially it’s extraordinarily dark second chapter- and have decided it’s best to leave us to our own devices and not go fiddling round with the past (although it’s hard to think of an apocalyptic time-bent future which is any worse that a world that has the third series of Skins in it).

On the subject of Back to the Future- how the hell did they get away with all that?! The first one’s essentially a tale of era-hopping incest while the second installment ups the ante by covering domestic abuse and alcoholism and then wrapping it all up in a cautionary tale of dreams which have been cruelly shattered to death by fate and consequence. At least they had the good grace to make the final film a knockabout Western romp- though while filming one stunt for it Michael J. Fox was almost accidentally killed by hanging. The more I think about it, the more I think that if Robert Zemeckis considers this to be family entertainment he needs to be put on some sort of register.

I certainly hope I never find myself with the ability to travel through time as I’m pretty sure I’d be hopeless at it. The basic problem would be that I’d find myself faced with far too much choice to deal with- where should I go? When should I go? Who should I meet? What should I witness? And those questions don’t come anywhere near getting into the real issues time travel throws up either. For example I have a ‘freebie’ list of 5 celebrities I’m allowed guilt-free sex with and it took me months to complete when I only had contemporary women to choose from; I know I’d be paralized by indecision for millenia if I could visit the past and suddenly had to figure out who to jettison from the list in order to secure a berth for ‘Walk Like An Egyptian’-era Susanna Hoffs.

My inability to deal with choice is mostly brought into sharp relief when I’m faced with the treasure trove of a Sky+ box. I’m currently writing this at my girlfriend’s parents’ house and, as is so often the case, I’m the last person awake in the house and will probably be sat here into the wee small hours cycling endlessly through 4 quadrillion channels looking for something to watch. However, whereas the famous old cliche is that there’s all these channels and there’s never anything on the grim reality is much, much worse- there’s far too much on and every time I find something I fancy sitting through I get overwhelmed with a fear that there’s something on another channel that I’m prefer to see instead, and so I set off trawling through the channels again until I’ve gone through them all, half an hour has passed and I have to flick through everything again as most of the channels are now showing something different. Intriguingly, if I do land on a particular program for more than a few seconds I’ll find it utterly impossible to sit patiently through a commercial break and start looking through every station again; only to find that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THE THOUSANDS OF CHANNELS IS SHOWING COMMERCIALS AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME! It’s a staggering piece of synchronisation from all concerned- whoever it is that makes it happen really ought to commit their talents to running the railways instead.

Anyway…

Perhaps this inability to cope with a plethora of choice is why men like myself love making ‘Top 5′ lists. In ‘High Fidelity’ Nick Hornby seems to suggest that obsession with list-making is what men do when they should be busy considering important things like being all responsible and, if the book’s to be taken literally, getting pussy-whipped by a haughty solicitor. I reckon, however, he’s doing his gender a great disservice here as the Top 5 list is actually a useful way of dealing with the modern world and prioritising what really matters and what you really care about (although, as I’ve proved earlier with my ‘freebie’ list, it’s a media that tends to suffer from information overload if time travelling is brought into the equation).

In fact, speaking as someone who’s filled in more than his fair share of job application forms in the past few months, I reckon asking people a bunch of Top 5 questions is a much better way to shape a workforce than looking at C.V.s and cliched personal statements that state the applicant is ‘a driven, goal-oriented individual’ with ‘excellent team-making skills’ when, if we’re honest, no-ones ever going to write anything truthful like ‘I’m applying for this job because I stole all the stationery in my previous office and sold the bosses Beamer on e-bay when he disciplined me for goosing his wife at the Christmas party’.

If I was inviting applications to work for me, I wouldn’t give a tinker’s cuss about someone’s experience- anyone can be trained to do any job given time- but I would like to know exactly what sort of person I’m inviting to share my workplace for 40 hours a week. If we’re going to be spending that much time together it’s much more important that I find out what they’re top 5 biscuits are and if Prince makes an appearance in their ‘Top 5 Recording Artists of the 1980s’ list.

Everyone’s worked as part of a team where at least 50% of their fellow members are people with whom they don’t share even the tiniest interest or belief and this can’t be bad for employee morale and the performance of any company- especially in ‘these trying times’ ((tm) Practically Every Report on BBC News For The Last 6 Months). People would work much better together if their colleagues and themselves had at least some crossover when in their lists of such things as Top 5 singles, brands of crisp, American teen movie nude scenes, cartoon animals or supervillains.

And, best of all, you can ask people what their Top 5 films are- and if ‘Back To The Future 2′ is on the list you’ll know they’re probably seriously disturbed.